Mainstream Media puts 2nd Amendment under microscope

Biden wants inoperable "smart guns",...

Biden wants inoperable “smart guns”,Obama wants a “assault weapons” ban #tcot #secondamendment #tlot (Photo credit: Robert Reed Daly)


The news today is very disturbing.  All I am hearing is that the second amendment is under a microscope.  Why?  It is my understanding that there needs to be major congressional approval before any changes could be made to the constitution.  After that, it would have to pass the scrutiny of the Supreme Court to determine that the changes are constitutional.  So what gives?  Are our God given inalienable rights now up for public scrutiny?  Are we under attack by the media and their pronounced anti-gun agenda?

The media, along with the White House, have made a mockery of our constitution.  They have consistently been on the side of misinformation, instead of reporting facts.  The White House has declared a war on the constitution and is using illegal methods and use of funds to advance their agenda.

My question is when is this madness going to stop?  When is the Senate and Congress, or the Supreme Court, going to put their feet down and squash this treasonous behavior?  I guess that remains to be seen.  Currently, this is a completely partisan issue.  The Democrats wanting and pushing legislation that violates more than just second amendment rights.  The Republicans delaying what they can as well as pushing laws that protect the American citizen from these attacks on the second amendment.

Many gun manufacturers have stepped up and are refusing to sell, or limiting sales to state and city agencies that violate the rights of their constituents.  This is a step in the right direction.  There needs to be a show of resistance from the American people and businesses.

Now is not the time to sit and wait, but the time to stand and fight.  Contact your representatives.  Let them respectfully know how you feel and that if they approve of these bans and legislation that they will be looking for work after the next election.


Biden says “buy a shotgun”


Once again Joe Biden opens his mouth to spew forth the draconian babble on gun control. He says you don’t need an AR15. You don’t need thirty rounds. He says that he even instructed his wife to go on the balcony and fire off two shots out of a double barreled shotgun to scare off intruders. Wow. Talk about completely out of touch with reality. All of that DC kool-aid must have really put the zap on his brain.

I hate to say that no one will even pay him attention, but by the legislation being presented in a number of states, it seems to fall on the party line. Go figure.



Red Brain, Blue Brain: Are There Neurological Differences Between Democrats and Republicans? |

Could this be an attempt at making Republicans out to be “mental” in regards to gun control? Watch out for this. I’m thinking these kind of studies will keep coming up in the near future. S

Chicago police chief: Second Amendment supporters guilty of corruption – Washington Times

Ok. I’ve had enough. This latest comment by a Police Chief in Chicago is completely freaking absurd. These comments from a man who apparently has absolutely no capability to enforce laws or stop violence in his city. Really? Did you fall out of the dumba** tree as a child? To attack the citizens of your city with these accusations shows the true level of corruption in Chicago. Mayor on down. Read the article. This guy makes me sick. S

Why Does Obama Want Terrorism In Your Backyard?


The news today is full of anti-gun propoganda aimed at you. The administration is beefing up its rhetoric against law abiding citizens and labelling you as domestic terrorists. All in an attempt at the ultimate control of the population. The media tells you what to think by basing their stories not on facts, but on the agenda provided by the administration.

Which would be the lesser of two evils?  The God given right of Americans to bear arms?  In which we the people will be armed and able to defend against what the administration cannot. OR a completely disarmed Amerika that has no defense from the administration nor the criminals at large. Do we try to stop the few bad people with guns or do we cower in fear at the gangs of violent criminals that will surely rise up once the fear of reprisal is fully gone?  California Law Enforcement has already shown that a Waco style end to a standoff is prefered. The destruction of private property condoned in order to subdue a terrorist.

The fanatism about guns doing all the killing, while it takes a deranged human to make the gun function. Timothy McVeigh used a large IED to get his point across. A Ryder truck filled with fertilizer and ammonium nitrate. If guns are outlawed, then what’s to stop the proliferation of the use of IEDs on American soil?  Removal of guns isn’t going to stop the determined from continuing their attacks. Reports of IED attacks will replace shootings in the news. Instead of worrying about school or movie theater shootings, worry over mass carnage of explosive terrorist attacks will prevail. So what will the response of the administration be? Will we see Israel type bombing in the United States in retaliation?  Where will it end?

I do study history. This point in our society is a slippery slope. Your freedoms as Americans are under attack. Proposed legislation in numerous states has even gone as far as confiscation of arms based solely on cosmetic features and not on function. The very weapons that earned our freedom and defended against communism and tyranny are threatened.

The administration is right. It is time for America to decide. Stand against the tyranny and corruption our government has become or descend into the chaos of a government controlled society where freedom is no longer a factor.

You choose. My opinion doesn’t count. You are the one who has to decide. Do you want freedom? 



This is the last day of my look at the twenty three executive orders on gun control enacted by the President.

23. Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health.

National dialogue huh?  All I’ve heard is forced fed opinions of what the administration wants and not any serious discussion of options or abilities or proposals. All I’ve seen are reports of more violence that suddenly coincides with an agenda. All I’ve seen are gross indescretions on the part of main stream media in the amount of misinformation and confusion over facts.

If we are to have a diologue then there needs to be talking and discussion and not just a bunch of propoganda trash talking.

Just sayin.




What is that saying? Divide and conquer?  Just what do you think is happening in this country?  If a child molester moved in next door to you, you would be jumping up and down having a total conniption fit over it. We have a President that is taking this country and its ideals apart piece by piece and no one wants to scream about it?


I know that you want to say “that can’t happen here” but it is folks. Every liberty that you take for granted is in danger of being taken from you. The 2nd amendment is only the first attack. Next will be the 1st amendment. Then they will just do away with the constitution entirely.

Police are already allowed to shoot innocent bystanders without fear of reprisal. Obama already states he has the LEGAL ability to kill americans with drones if HE feels you ate a threat to national security. Major media is PAID to push the president’s agenda and not report some incidents. The economy is atrocious. Jobs aren’t out there. Meanwhile tax dollars are going to support illegal aliens. YOUR tax dollars.

How much more do you need to get mad and do something about it?

If you dont speak out now, you just may not get another chance.



This is day twenty two of my look at the twenty three executive orders on gun control enacted by the President.

22. Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations.

What?  Do you mean that this administration is going to commit to something other than destroying the constitution?  Yes mental healthcare needs to be fixed. But its on so many levels that it would take at least a decade to do.

And it would take money, which the President has said all of his proposals would not raise the deficit by one dime. So I guess this order is just talk, because according to him there wont be any more costs.

Am I harsh towards Obama?  Yep.



I will say this to begin with, having been in the military and having worn a badge, I completely understand the pressures and fears the officers in California were under during this Dorner escapade.

The video I have seen this morning on the news shows me that the shootout/ standoff yesterday was nothing more than a disorganized bumbling chinese fire drill. Every officer was shooting at what?  One man barricaded in a cabin?  Apparently there was no concern for hikers or people camping in the area. Definately no regard for the property. At least 50 to 60 officers against one with a gun. ALL officers were using “assault weapons” but chose to move news reporters away so they could burn him out?

Now I am not condoning the behavior of a murderer. Never will. BUT law enforcements emotion driven hate fueled response with absolute disregard to persons or property should be questioned.

How many rounds fired yesterday without hitting the suspect? Hundreds, thousands?  Each bullet has a lawyer attached to it. Tear gas?  Ok. “Burners”? That is someones property. Most insurance policies are not going to include military style police actions resulting in distruction.

Just sayin.